mailing list archives
Re: adobe.com important subdomain SQL injection again!
From: Marsh Ray <marsh () extendedsubset com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:08 -0600
On 12/18/2010 05:30 PM, Victor Rigo wrote:
Let's see, flash is:
- Has it's own programming language
- Is embedded on websites
Not on my machine?
It's not ineptness, it's what you get when you right software that can
actually do stuff.
Adobe comes from a time when you could write PC software without caring
about security. Yeah, it was a heck of a lot easier to write just about
anything back then because it was well and proper that anything could do
Nowdays, the first questions after "hey our software could do this" must
be "but should it do that? What else could someone leverage that new
capability to do? How does it combine with every other feature in our
app or even on the whole platform? What if somebody does it repeatedly
in a tight loop? With pathological inputs?" and so on. These questions
take a long time to answer.
So if a vendor is known for "letting app developers do more stuff" and
not also known for "letting users control what stuff gets done on their
own machines" then they are laggards, not leaders, in my view.
If Java applets were still the hip thing, you'd see the same thing about
There's undoubtedly some truth to that. But at the same time, it doesn't
seem like a useful line of reasoning:
* It's still not an argument for using Flash.
* That Java plugins have had chronic security bugs doesn't mean that
Flash doesn't suck too.
* You seem to imply that you don't think that Adobe is likely to secure
Flash any time soon. You're not saying "Adobe will secure Flash in the
next patch and then it will be great." But you listed all the great
stuff it does, so I have to think you would have said something like
that if you believed it. You may be making Flash look worse than it is.
* It's basically an "appeal to futility" argument: no one could make a
development platform and browser plugin that is significantly more
secure (or does a better job of managing the security vs. "doing stuff"
trade off) so therefore we should accept the status quo. That's why it's
not useful: it gives no guidance on directions in which to improve.
Personally, I kind of like Flash. It gives me a single kill switch for
90% of the useless blinking crap and popups on the internet. Flash is a
really appropriate name for exactly what I don't want to see on a web
page. I hope it remains the platform of choice for those who develop
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/