|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: verizon vs m$
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:02:30 +0200
do i get it right?:
1. the verizon paper is entirely correct
2. some interpret it as a feature and some as a bug?
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 11:25:36PM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote:
in a world like this, verizon kills exploder bugs:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/03/protected_mode_bypass/
http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/whitepapers/wp_escapingmicrosoftprotectedmodeinternetexplorer_en_xg.pdf
the language doesn't seem passionate:
-----
Finally, Microsoft and other software vendors should clearly document which features do and do not
have associated security claims. Clearly stating which features make security claims, and which do not,
will allow informed decisions to be made on IT security issues.
-----
lol
--
joro
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: verizon vs m$, (continued)
Re: verizon vs m$ Dan Kaminsky (Dec 06)
Re: verizon vs m$ Georgi Guninski (Dec 07)
|