Full Disclosure: Re: verizon vs m$

[Dan Kaminsky <dan () doxpara com>]

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com> wrote:
> do i get it right?:
>
> 1. the verizon paper is entirely correct
Well, sure.

> 2. some interpret it as a feature and some as a bug?
Does it have to be either?

> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 11:25:36PM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> > in a world like this, verizon kills exploder bugs:
> >
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/03/protected_mode_bypass/
> > http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/whitepapers/wp_escapingmicrosoftprotectedmodeinternetexplorer_en_xg.pdf
> >
> > the language doesn't seem passionate:
> > -----
> > Finally, Microsoft and other software vendors should clearly document which features do and do not
> > have associated security claims. Clearly stating which features make security claims, and which do not,
> > will allow informed decisions to be made on IT security issues.
> > -----
> >
> > lol
> >
> > --
> > joro
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/