|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: verizon vs m$
From: Dan Kaminsky <dan () doxpara com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:22:42 +0900
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 07:16:34 EST, Larry Seltzer said:
2. some interpret it as a feature and some as a bug?
Does it have to be either?
It sounds to me as if this is a deliberate design decision, and people are
disagreeing over the severity of its implications.
Some people refer to that as a "feee-tchure" or "Broken As Designed". It's
technically not a bug, but it does violate the Principle of Least Surprise.
To be fair, "Surprise! Nothing works" would be a little more surprising.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Fwd: verizon vs m$, (continued)
Re: verizon vs m$ Dan Kaminsky (Dec 06)
Re: verizon vs m$ Georgi Guninski (Dec 07)
|