mailing list archives
Re: Risk measurements
From: "Craig S. Wright" <craig.wright () Information-Defense com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:40:07 +1100
As Valdis has stated, we want economic optimality. Valdis has stated this in
a far easier to understand manner than I.
I will publish a financial model on the blog this weekend that displays the
Dr. Craig S Wright <http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/> GSE-Malware,
GSE-Compliance, LLM, & ...
Information Defense <http://www.information-defense.com/> Pty Ltd
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]
Sent: Friday, 12 February 2010 11:31 PM
To: Christian Sciberras
Cc: craig.wright () information-defense com; McGhee, Eddie; full-disclosure;
security-basics () securityfocus com; Thor (Hammer of God)
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Risk measurements
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:09:55 +0100, Christian Sciberras said:
There's a time for finding fancy interesting numbers and a time to get
the system going with the least flaws possible.
You don't want "the least flaws possible". We can get very close to zero
flaws per thousand lines of code - but the result ends up costing hundreds
of dollars per line. You want "the most economical number of flaws" - if
you get it down to 10 flaws, and the next flaw will cost you $750,000 to
but you estimate your loss as $500,000 if you don't fix it and get hacked,
why are you spending $250,000 extra to fix the flaw?
Why should any entity bother with risk modeling if it is not used at all?
Here's the real question to the subject; What does risk modeling fix?
Risk modeling is what tells you the flaw will cost $500K to not fix.
And since you totally screw the pooch if you got it wrong and not fixing
it costs $1M, people like to do a good job of risk modelling.
* Unknown Key
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: SMS Banking Craig S. Wright (Feb 10)
Re: SMS Banking Sunnet Beskerming (Feb 10)
FW: SMS Banking Thor (Hammer of God) (Feb 10)