|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
From: Charles Skoglund <charles.skoglund () bitsec se>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:11:10 +0100
This discussion is getting weirder and weirder. If an examiner finds
evidence on YOUR computer / cell phone / usb disks / whatever, please do
tell me how it's not necessarily yours? By claiming your computer has been
hacked? You do know an examiner usually knows how to double-check your story
for malicious code right? Or what are you guys talking about?
My experience is that when I find the evidence, the person/s being
investigated confesses quite rapidly.
Cheers!
On 1/26/10 4:31 AM, "Bipin Gautam" <bipin.gautam () gmail com> wrote:
So to the point, the techniques of forensic examiners were flawed from
day one given that any text/evidence found on your computer is NOT
NECESSARILY yours! Does that break digital forensics........?
oops.................
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
(Thread continues...)
|