|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Windows XP bug
From: Robert Święcki <robert () swiecki net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:37:40 +0200
But, there is difference with evaluation/calculation in windows and linux.
Here is how...
It rather depends on where the path evaluation takes place - kernel vs
userland. It might also depend on whether 'cd' checks explicitly for
existence of path elements (bash's cd does)
one () ubuntubox:~$ cd thisdoesntexist/
-bash: cd: thisdoesntexist: No such file or directory
one () ubuntubox:~$ cd thisdoesntexist/../
-bash: cd: thisdoesntexist/../: No such file or directory
one () ubuntubox:~$
$ pwd
/tmp
$ ln -s /usr/share a
$ cd a/..
$ pwd
/tmp
$ cd -P a/..
$ pwd
/usr
syscall trace for the case 1.
chdir("/tmp") (path is being resolved in userland)
for the case 2.
chdir("a/..") (path is being resolved in kernel)
PS. While we are at this subject: if you ever dreamt of
non-shell-built-in 'cd' command, I recommend checking out this one -
http://www.swiecki.net/red/progs/extcd.c
--
Robert Święcki
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|