|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: WiFi sniffing need to be connected?
From: Tyler Borland <tborland1 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:15:02 -0400
Login for email seems to be through normal http. Messages will be
traveling over plaintext as well.
As long as the access point for wireless isn't encrypted, then
promiscuous will definitely work and be a much better angle. Best
spots for that is hotspots or places that allow unencrypted wifi
access, but you have to pay to 'use' it.
You also have to be within the capture distance of whomever you're
trying to sniff. So hidden extended antennae in backpack might be a
good idea.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Vinicius Menezes <cotomax () yahoo com> wrote:
Hello guys,
I´m trying to snif msn/mail messages throw wifi.
It´s necessary be connected to one specific station or just set promiscus mode to get all traffic?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers? Cor Rosielle (Jul 01)
Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers? Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) (Jul 01)
Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers? Cor Rosielle (Jul 01)
Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers? Dario Ciccarone (dciccaro) (Jul 09)
|