|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: targetted SSH bruteforce attacks
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:49:07 -0400
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:21:47 CDT, Paul Schmehl said:
Why? Ssh is encrypted, so you're not exposing a password when you login. How
does public key authentication make you more secure (in a practical sense)?
Compare the work effort needed by an attacker to brute-force a password (I mean,
c'mon Paul - these ssh woodpeckers wouldn't keep hammering if it didn't work
once in a while) with how much woodpecking would be needed to brute-force
a key-authenticated login.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: targetted SSH bruteforce attacks, (continued)
Re: targetted SSH bruteforce attacks Xin LI (Jun 17)
Re: targetted SSH bruteforce attacks Mr. MailingLists (Jun 17)
Re: targetted SSH bruteforce attacks Mark Byrne (Jun 17)
Re: targetted SSH bruteforce attacks Pavel Kankovsky (Jun 18)
Re: targetted SSH bruteforce attacks Ashish SHUKLA (Jun 18)
(Thread continues...)
|