mailing list archives
Re: Chrome and Safari users open to stealth HTML5 Application Cache attack
From: Chris Evans <scarybeasts () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:41:27 -0700
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Dan Kaminsky <dan () doxpara com> wrote:
In summary, any http hit on an insecure network is dangerous on all
(FWIW, Chromium resolves this for me. When I type mail<enter> into the
omnibar, it auto-completes to https://mail.google.com/)
Actually, I see this as a legitimate gap. HTTP links don't cache-mix with
HTTPS links, and cookies can have server-side integrity checking to prevent
HTTP pollution (lets not talk about the secure tag for cookies), but if it
is indeed the case that there is no way to have a HTTPS-exclusive
Application Cache, then that is a feature killing bug that's been
legitimately called out.
Eh? Lava's attack poisons a plain HTTP resource. As per "regular"
caching, Application Cache is supposed to separate the effects of HTTP
and HTTPS responses.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: Chrome and Safari users open to stealth HTML5 Application Cache attack Lavakumar Kuppan (Jun 28)