Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability
From: paul.szabo () sydney edu au
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:19:44 +1000

Dear Marsh,

Personal opinions (hoping not to start a flame war) on your questions:

A. Does anyone think there would be much gained by me requesting (or
insisting on) a CVE number?

I do not see the need for CVEs for such "trivial" (easily verifiable)
problems. I find them useful when problems or fixes are reported in
"obscure" software (e.g. in binary-only proprietary distributions), so
as to identify same-known-problem reports.

B. Does anybody actually care about local escalations any more, or is
everyone just expected to have their very own personal virtual private
cloud for a security boundary?

We each must protect our own cocoons. Saving the world is impossible.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   psz () maths usyd edu au   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]