Full Disclosure: Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up

[Colin Copley <colin.75 () btinternet com>]

The more knowledge of your enemy tactics you have the better no?

And though I would still prefer actual proof of the info, the Pentagon 
top brass debunking is something they would do if it were true as well?

Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> As a result, even 100% perfect knowledge of our tactics wouldn't
> translate into all *that* big an increase in attack effectiveness, unless
> hidden in that 5% is a "ventilation shaft that leads directly to the reactor
> core" flaw in our tactics ("Every 3rd Tuesday, we do XYZ and one very small
> bomb in the right place would set off a chain reaction of all the munitions on
> the base").
>
>
> I believe the "endangers our sources" part has already been debunked
> by the top leadership at the Pentagon.
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/