|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Cipher detection
From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor () hammerofgod com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 16:39:21 +0000
Actually it is a valid Base64 string - it just decodes to 24, 106, 27, 67, 102, 236, 169, 222, 184, 61, 117, 64, 153,
160, 226, 12, 24. To get dummy () example com<mailto:dummy () example com> you would have to XOR that resulting binary
string with 124, 31, 118, 46, 31, 172, 108, 174, 217, 80, 5, 44, 124, 142, 129, 99, 117 which I don't see any pattern
in (close to that anyway, I did it in my head so I'm sure I screwed up some of them). Maybe someone sees something...
Of course, Cal could have done it, which means it's probably Matrix for "titties." :-p
The input and output are both 17 bytes, so an XOR makes sense, but another 17 character example would help. And a 20.
t
From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of
Maksim.Filenko () fuib com
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 1:23 AM
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Cipher detection
Hi Full-Disclosure,
I'm trying to figure out what kind of cipher was used in this:
GGobQ2bsqd64PXVAmaDiDBg=
Looks like Base64, but it's not. The original string is:
dummy () example com<mailto:dummy () example com>
Thanks all!
wbr,
- Max
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|