Full Disclosure: Re: Apache Killer

[Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:52:00PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:35:04 +0300, Georgi Guninski said:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:45:53AM +0100, Mark J Cox wrote:
> > > Use CVE-2011-3192.
> > why the fuck use this shit?
> So that when two different people issue advisories about it, if they both say
> CVE-2011-3192, we know it's the same issue.  Otherwise if you got some people
> writing about Kingcope's hole with gzip and others writing about Zalewski's
> hole with Range: it's hard to tell if they're really the same issue or not.
ok, there might be some sense in using canonical names,
but why chose possibly the worst service available?

from their front page: "CVE®" - remember, remember what happened with the securityfocus/bugtraq exploit DB?

btw, all the shitty id that should be "used" says:

** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new 
security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/