Full Disclosure: Re: OT: Firefox question / poll

[夜神 岩男 <supergiantpotato () yahoo co jp>]

On 12/21/2011 03:54 AM, metasansana () gmail com wrote:
> I would say usability, by the time it pops up the nasty is probably already done.
> ------Original Message------
> From: Charles Morris
> Sender: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
> To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> Subject: [Full-disclosure] OT: Firefox question / poll
> Sent: Dec 20, 2011 13:40
>
> I'm curious what everyone's opinion is on the following question...
> esp. to any FF dev people on list:
>
> Do you think that the Firefox "warning: unresponsive script" is meant
> as a security feature or a usability feature?
Usability.

To begin with, most people click through the DANGER SCREEN warnings 
about bad TLS certificates. With this in mind it is obvious that a 
developer can't expect the average browser-using population to even know 
what a script is.

However, the string("not responding") + situation("browser gets stuck") 
resonates with the average retard, so this approach is sensible from a 
usability standpoint.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/