I can't answer the question but it would be even more interesting to
answer this if you're using a One-Time-Pad (i.e. two files of equal size on
two different servers, both XORed give you the data). There exists a
mathematical proof that none of the two files leak a single bit of
information of the original data :)
Chris
On 02/18/2011 07:50 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote:
Sorry, when I say eligible, I mean "which server would they be allowed to
take down by law?".
I'm not too hot on the laws of encryption, but I'm sure there is
something which states that hosting encrypted files are not illegal, it's
distributing the key which allows you to gain access to those fails, which
is actually illegal.
*DISCLAIMER: I don't know if the above is true or not, so apologies if I
got this wrong*
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:46 PM, ck <c.kernstock () googlemail com> wrote:
I go with the server hosting the files since the key should be
significant smaller than the files and therefor much easier to mirror.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
<cal.leeming () simplicitymedialtd co uk> wrote:
So here's a thought.
If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and
hosted
on one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would
be eligible for take down?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
