|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Python ssl handling could be better...
From: dave b <db.pub.mail () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:35:57 +1100
Marsh, the thing is that the ssl module was only introduced in python 2.6. [0]
There has been other options for a _long_ time. As an example, (for
https traffic) pycurl. So python developers can and do use public wifi
without problems. Only the ones who do not read warning messages are
at risk. Of course a fair amount of code would have been written
before the warnings were added...
[0] http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/2.6.html#improved-ssl-support
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: Python ssl handling could be better..., (continued)
Re: Python ssl handling could be better... bk (Mar 02)
Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Michael Krymson (Mar 04)
Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Charles Morris (Mar 07)
Re: Python ssl handling could be better... Michael Krymson (Mar 04)
|