|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches
From: phocean <0x90 () phocean net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:05:21 +0200
Wrong. Passive FTP is the first example that comes to my mind where
inspection (based on statefulness) is needed.
Also, if you filter (and you should) both inbound and outbound traffic,
how do you allow legitimate responses to the server?
In many cases and network designs, statefulness also allows to build
slightly shorter and more efficient filtering rules.
This way, a step toward simplicity is often a step toward security.
On Wed, 11 May 2011 09:54:59 +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 4:52 PM, phocean wrote:
I want to read how you justify that stateful hardware is useless to
check sessions of TCP and upper protocols.
In front of servers, where there is no state to inspect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches Michael Krymson (May 11)
(Thread continues...)
|