|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches
From: phocean <0x90 () phocean net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:40:57 +0200
If you say so, then it must be true.
On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:33:37 +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 6:05 PM, phocean wrote:
Passive FTP is the first example that comes to my mind where
inspection (based on statefulness) is needed.
I really don't want to continue this on full-disclosure, but there's
still no material security value to stateful inspection in front of
servers, with either active or passive ftp.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches Michael Krymson (May 11)
(Thread continues...)
|