Full Disclosure: Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit?

[Laurelai <laurelai () oneechan org>]

On 10/3/2011 4:29 PM, GloW - XD wrote:
> There's only 4 billion IP's to scan if he want to get all out of his
> trick.
>
> Synscan can do a subnet (class b) in ~3 minutes nowdays ;)
> I would think he would find it.
> i did a scan on a kit i found, root:barcelona123 , and, got like 100 
> boxes in 10minutes of scanning, ofc, i looked up the IP range, usually 
> they scan by range and classes, log to file, then log in.
> It is very fast nowdays, and very effective if done properly... i have 
> seen this only recently become "effevive" but, it is..and  there is 
> plenty of fools who will execute it as-is... that is just, to easy, 
> every box a kid has root on, will opfc try it *just incase that, fd is 
> wrong* ...and i have seen one case already ;p so, it is the easiest 
> way to engineer, *keep this private* or pvt pvt pvt dont leak!
> khehe.. best trix ever.
> xd
>
>
> On 4 October 2011 02:29, <nix () myproxylists com 
> <mailto:nix () myproxylists com>> wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/25728/w000t-shell.c.html
>     >
>     > It's a trojan, based on the w00t-shell.c code; the shell code adds a
>     > passwordless root account under the name w000t.
>     >
>
>     Nice try though. I was not aware that this shellcode was freely
>     available
>     but after debugging the same shellcode I noticed that passwordless
>     account.
>
>     He'll have plenty of work to do while scanning for that SSH account.
>     There's only 4 billion IP's to scan if he want to get all out of his
>     trick.
>
>     >
>     > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:31:29 +0100
>     > From: d.martyn.fulldisclosure () gmail com
>     <mailto:d.martyn.fulldisclosure () gmail com>
>     > To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
>     <mailto:full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
>     > Subject: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.2.17 exploit?
>     >
>     > I regularly trawl Pastebin.com to find code - often idiots leave
>     some 0day
>     > and similar there and it is nice to find.
>     >
>     > Well, seeing as I have no test boxes at the moment, can someone
>     check this
>     > code in a VM? I am not sure if it is legit or not.
>     >
>     >
>     > http://pastebin.com/ygByEV2e
>     >
>     > Thanks :)
>     >
>     > ~Darren
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>     > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>     > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>     >
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>     Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>     Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Someone should write a scanner that checks for that stuff + pulls RSA 
keys from the web and adds it to a keyring, that would be a nice scanner.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/