On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:34:00 -0300, root said:
You don't have the faintest idea of how licencing works. You cannot slap
a GPL v3 license to any software you see, much less erase the author's
names. If you find a code in the internet without any license, you
pretty much can't touch it, and must re-implement it completely.
In particular, if code was written in a country that's a signatory to the
Berne
conventions, it's usually somewhere between very difficult and impossible
to
actually place a software work in the public domain - at least under US
law,
even putting an explicit "This work is hereby placed in the public domain"
quite likely does *NOT* suffice - the only two clear ways to public domain
in
the US are expiration of the "lifetime of the author plus 75 years"
copyright,
and "works for hire by a US federal government employee as part of his
duties"
(so, for instance, NASA photographs are public domain - but photos of NASA
activities taken by non-NASA photographers probably aren't).
Also, smart programmers *don't* release their code into the public domain -
that means that anybody can do anything with it. And that includes stealing
it,
using it to make tons of money, and then suing you if they discover a bug.
The
original reason for the BSD and X11 licenses was because you can't stick a
"hold harmless" clause on something you public-domain.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
