On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com> wrote:
Except that they weren't obviously unarmed.
Not only where they not obviously unarmed, they appeared to be armed.
Look at the 4 minute mark.
That sure as shit looks like an RPG.
The crew thought the group was armed. Ergo, they were cleared to engage.
This wasn't a war crime...and the allegation that it was just makes
people look ridiculous.
Listen to yourself: we weren't sure if they were armed, so we killed
them. Put yourself and your family in the shoes of the dead folks. Its
not a comfortable place to be, is it?
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:05 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:44:44 PDT, Mike Hale said:
Seriously! Think about the injustice of having American helicopters
engage armed individuals shadowing American soldiers.
Shooting at "armed individuals" is one thing. If it's "civilians and Reuters
employees" who *aren't* obviously armed, it's something else.
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0