|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Associate professor from Pakistan National University - spammer
From: Tonu Samuel <tonu () spam ee>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:04:23 +0900
On 2012/08/16, at 12:49, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:55:41 +0900, Tonu Samuel said:
I found that person who is spamming
OpenCV list with "Plz visit my e-gaming site at http://." is PhD
So... did you establish that the person doing the spamming actually *is*
that professor, or merely somebody who managed to phish the professor's
credentials and is using their identity to send the spam? (We get 5 or 10 phished
users a day, and maybe 1 or 2 actual spammers a year)
I handle spam cases daily too and I find new spammers weekly. And I do lot of analysis do be able to prove what I say
in my blog. I have sued few times and get lot of letters from data protection authority but was till now prove my words.
In this case there are facts you can easily verify:
There is a gaming site meyraj.com, registered to this professor name. Not company, not someone else but he personally
runs it.
There is a Facebook wall https://www.facebook.com/fahim.arif.9 where we can see posts advertising same site for two
years. Look on all details of this account.
There are 175688 tweets on http://twitter.com/Meyraj about this gaming site
There are spams over half year in OpenCV lists under his name and Software Engineer related to computer vision does not
notice it.
Knowing this please explain the motivation of some "hacker" to advertise his site.
I am not so naive. I also have lot of experience dealing with them and many of them try to tell me that someone else
did spamming trying to advertise their sites etc. My experience is identical to one listed here
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/section/ROKSO%20FAQ
and it says:
"
However, correcting what a spammer claims is an 'error' is not as straight forward as it may seem, since spammers are
not people known for honesty; in fact they are almost all con men, fraudsters and chronic liars. Spamhaus regularly
receives letters from spammer's lawyers attempting to claim that all of a spammers records are in error and demanding
all therefore be removed. We naturally pay little attention to such requests. A request by a spammer for correction of
a record must point to exactly what information is in error and must include verifiable proof that the error is indeed
an error."
Tonu
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|