Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
From: Laurelai <laurelai () oneechan org>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:37:44 -0600

On 1/7/12 5:31 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:


On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Laurelai <laurelai () oneechan org <mailto:laurelai () oneechan org>> wrote:

    On 1/7/12 3:50 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
    <mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
    On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:25:35 EST, Shyaam Sundhar said:

    Although, once they have gained popularity and to a stage where a garage
    office becomes a shop floor and a @home biz becomes a rent-a-million$-building
    office, it is time to shift priorities.
    If finding people who are competent enough to secure a payroll system for a
    company of 10 people is difficult, what makes you think that it's easy to find
    people who can secure the systems for a company of 1,000?

    As Stratfor has demonstrated, the talent pool of *really* competent security
    people is shallow enough that there's not even enough to secure the security
    companies. And it's not just Stratfor - when was the last time this list went a
    week without mocking a security company for its lack of clue?  It's an industry-wide
    problem - there's a *severe* shortage of experts.

    And even though schools like DeVry and ITT are churning out lots of people with
    entry level certifications, I'm not at all sure that helps the situation - we
    end up with a lot of people who are entry level, and don't realize how much
    they don't know. That makes them almost more dangerous than not having anybody
    at all. Sort of like if you walk alone through a scary part of town, you
    actually stand a good chance because you *know* you're alone and will act
    accordingly - but if you have a bodyguard with you, you're likely to act
    differently, and end up totally screwed when you find out said bodyguard has a
    belt in martial arts, but zero experience in street fighting...



    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter:http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -http://secunia.com/
    Perhaps these companies should try to hire the kids owning them
    instead of crying to the feds.


why do you think that kiddies using tools like sqlmap would be able to defend them from other kids?


--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
Because they pay the kids to own them in a safe manner to show that their so called expertsd are full of shit, then they fire said experts and hire competent people saving time money and resources, try and remember the guys with the certs are the ones getting owned by the skiddies with sqlmap so that should show you how broken the infosec industry is, want to fix it? Start by hiring the skids because they are still more competent than the guys they are owning. If that one gets owned you hire the guy who owned him ect... until you actually have to know what the hell your doing to be in infosec. Use a Darwinian approach to the industry.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]