Full Disclosure: Re: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability

[Daniel Preussker <daniel () preussker net>]

can you paste it somewhere where no login is required please?


Daniel Preussker

[ Security Consultant, Network & Protocol Security and Cryptography
[ LPI & Novell Certified Linux Engineer and Researcher
[ Daniel () Preussker Net
[ http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x87E736968E490AA1

On 12.08.2013, at 15:31, yuange wrote:

> somebody's poc
>  
> http://weibo.com/p/1005051838905715/weibo?from=page_100505_home&wvr=5.1&mod=weibomore#3610572387549394  
>  
> 微软呀，要怎么说你们呢。3个月的沟通不承认，一定要POC才承认，这么简单的代码看不懂吗？说得那么明白写POC真的有那么难吗？实在太磨叽了。
>  
> 这个漏洞你们还感谢360吗？不是我不配合，3个月的沟通，不给POC就关闭这个漏洞的修补。顺便问一声，那几个漏洞修补还要花几个月呀？
>  
>  
> From: yuange1975 () hotmail com
> To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> Subject: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:22:18 +0000
>
>
> #0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability http://t.cn/zQJYHgA  .Technical challenge how to write exploit code?
>
> 漏洞报告已经说得很明白，指出问题代码，怎么定位代码。鉴于微软一次次的纠缠于需要提供POC，那就让大家来写POC吧，写好记得发一份给微软。 ：）
>
> https://twitter.com/yuange75  我的观点：
>
> #antiNSA 
> 现在APT的大环境下，POC代码、EXP利用技术都是宝贵资源，不想因为中间环节被控制或者SNIFFER而丢失这些宝贵资源，现在坚定报告漏洞不提供POC和EXP，除非有偿的漏洞报告。反汇编指出问题代码点，对于漏洞修补已经提供了足够的重要信息了，要想POC自己分析。
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/