|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Abusing Windows 7 Recovery Process
From: Gage Bystrom <themadichib0d () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:57:36 -0700
Since when was full disk encryption standard in windows 7 let alone windows
environments in general? Sure there are probably some but nonetheless
On Jul 13, 2013 6:47 PM, "Alex" <fd () daloo de> wrote:
You didn't tell us how you cracked the full disc encryption. (There are
ways around controls, but that is why we have multiple security layers.)
Am 13. Juli 2013 22:49:11 schrieb Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu:
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:13:38 +0300, Moshe Israel said:
All secured/regulated systems as required by most
certifications/standards/best practices.
You're new in the industry, aren't you? :)
The point you're missing is that the vast majority of computers aren't
covered
by said certifications and standards. And most of the certifications are
merely a money grab by the auditors - the last numbers I found,
something like
98% of breaches of systems that were covered by PCI were of systems that
at
the time of the breach were PCI-compliant. In other words, being PCI
compliant
didn't actually slow the attackers down one bit.
You social engineer your way into the 5th office building you pass, pick
a
random PC on the 4th floor - I'll bet you that PC is probably *not*
running
sufficient monitoring to detect an intruder rebooting it and messing with
the system.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|