|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () coredump cx>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:47:19 -0700
Is this treated with the same way that says that Remote File Inclusion is not a security issue ?
I'm not sure how RFI came into play on this thread - the original
report wasn't about RFI.
I don't have an agenda here; I'm just trying to get to the bottom of
it and make sure that we converge on a common understanding of the
issue. As in any argument, it's fairly likely that one of us is wrong,
and I accept that it could very well be me - I have been wrong quite a
few times in my life, and it's always a valuable learning opportunity.
I think it's unfortunate that the thread has devolved into various
accusations and credential-slinging, because it reduces the likelihood
of such a productive outcome. Please feel free to ping me directly any
time, though - I'm happy to chat.
Cheers,
/mz
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC Alfred Beese (Mar 15)
Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC Alfred Beese (Mar 16)
Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC T Imbrahim (Mar 16)
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC T Imbrahim (Mar 16)
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC T Imbrahim (Mar 16)
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC T Imbrahim (Mar 16)
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC T Imbrahim (Mar 17)
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC Joxean Koret (Mar 17)
(Thread continues...)
|