mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC
From: "T Imbrahim" <TImbrahim () techemail com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:59:41 -0700
The thread read Google vulnerabilities with PoC. From my understanding it was a RFI vulnerability on YouTube, and I
voiced my support that this is a vulnerability.
I also explained a JSON Hijacking case as a follow up, and you said you didn't follow. So I am just saying that
treating security that way, there are other parties like NSA who welcome them happily.
--- lcamtuf () coredump cx wrote:
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () coredump cx>
To: TImbrahim () techemail com
Cc: M Kirschbaum <pr0ix () yahoo co uk>, full-disclosure <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:47:19 -0700
Is this treated with the same way that says that Remote File Inclusion is not a security issue ?
I'm not sure how RFI came into play on this thread - the original
report wasn't about RFI.
I don't have an agenda here; I'm just trying to get to the bottom of
it and make sure that we converge on a common understanding of the
issue. As in any argument, it's fairly likely that one of us is wrong,
and I accept that it could very well be me - I have been wrong quite a
few times in my life, and it's always a valuable learning opportunity.
I think it's unfortunate that the thread has devolved into various
accusations and credential-slinging, because it reduces the likelihood
of such a productive outcome. Please feel free to ping me directly any
time, though - I'm happy to chat.
Are you a Techie? Get Your Free Tech Email Address Now! Visit http://www.TechEmail.com
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/