What drugs are you on Pedro Ribeiro I wonder ...?
I express my views, if you don't like don't watch them. You responses so
far have only been assy speculations so don't tell me Im wrong , and
please
don't say thing like that. I don't know who the other people is, but
what
is true in security I support. Why you would Google my name ... ?
Is the English language causing you ill effects?
--- pedrib () gmail com wrote:
From: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib () gmail com>
To: TImbrahim () techemail com
Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk, Michal Zalewski <
lcamtuf () coredump cx>, mvilas () gmail com, gynvael () coldwind pl
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Google vulnerabilities with PoC
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:24:08 +0000
On 16 Mar 2014 23:36, "T Imbrahim" <TImbrahim () techemail com> wrote:
The thread read Google vulnerabilities with PoC. From my understanding
it was a RFI vulnerability on YouTube, and I voiced my support that this
is a vulnerability.
I also explained a JSON Hijacking case as a follow up, and you said you
didn't follow. So I am just saying that treating security that way,
there
are other parties like NSA who welcome them happily.
I think these guys - Alfred, Kirschbaum and Imbrahim are the OP's sock
puppets.
They are all first time posters from unusual free email providers jumping
to defend the OP out of nowhere. If you search Google for their emails
you
only find references to this thread.
They present similar (false and /or incorrect) arguments, talk about
their
extensive work experience, bash Google and its security team and send
repeated emails with exactly the same text.
This is turning into a madhouse... I hope this guy doesn't have access to
a gun.
Regards
Pedro
------------------------------
Are you a Techie? Get Your Free Tech Email Address Now! Visit
http://www.TechEmail.com