|
Security Incidents
mailing list archives
Re: New script-kiddie looking scan
From: Alain Fauconnet <alain () cscoms net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:03:52 +0700
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 09:47:18PM +0100, Luis Bruno wrote:
Jeff Kell wrote:
I'm noticing a growing number of scans of four ports (1433, 8000, 3128,
and 8080, in succession from increasing source ports). These are
MS-SQL, WinAmp, Ring Zero, and HTTP proxy. The scans look like:
Seen several squid HTTP proxies on 3128 too.
I suppose the $64K question is: is this a simple script-kiddie
scan, or perhaps a new worm signature as it attempts to propagate?
Can't think of a worm wading thru SQL Servers *and* HTTP proxies.
I'd guess someone is compiling a list of target IPs for future use;
SQL Server can be a valuable target, and misconfigured proxies could
be used to masquerade an attack.
From my current experience, misconfigured Squids, Socks proxies of any
kind are currently the target of choice for spammers. Even telnet
relays like routers (esp. Cisco) with weak or no passwords for normal
(non-enable) access. All these can be used to send spam as easily as
an open SMTP relay. People seem to care (a little bit) more about
their mail servers nowadays, but there still are *heaps* of open
Squids, Socks, Wingate, AnalogX etc. proxies around.
The infamous "CONNECT mail.domain.com:25 HTTP/1.1 <ENTER> <ENTER>"
to misconfigured Squids is really the thing I see the most today.
Greets,
--
Alain FAUCONNET
Sr. System Administrator
CS Communications Co. Ltd. - Thailand
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: DOS by Flooding a Network, (continued)
Re: DOS by Flooding a Network Skip Carter (Jun 17)
Re: DOS by Flooding a Network W.G. Iyer (Jun 17)
|