|
Security Incidents
mailing list archives
Re: Linux Kernel Exploits / ABFrag
From: Curt Wilson <netw3_security () hushmail com>
Date: 21 Oct 2002 16:16:04 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20021018184346.B44C5425C () sitemail everyone net>
I smell Burneye !! ..... what do you guys think ?
If you download the ABfrag file from
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/articles/intrusion_detection_article-
5933.html, and view or run strings on the file, you will see the burneye
signature in the file header:
TEEE burneye - TESO ELF Encryption Engine
I'm wondering if there is any way to determine the burneye options used by
analyzing the encrypted file? I doubt it, but does anyone have any
experience with this?
Looks like we need to get brute forcing that password (could be nearly
impossible), or perhaps find a good reverse engineer. I recall reading
material by Dave Dittrich about trying to reverse engineer the x2 SSH
exploit that had been protected with burneye. I also came across an
article somewhere, perhaps on the teso website, that talked about the
sorry state of the "white hat" reverse engineers. Personally, I could not
reverse engineer myself out of a wet paper bag.
I'm very curious to learn more about this exploit, and would enjoy seeing
the IDS activity discussed in the first message in this thread. Do we have
enough to make a snort signature? Did you get an image of the systems
memory at the time of the exploit? Perhaps there is a snowballs chance in
hell that the password used to run the executable could be recovered.
Curt Wilson
Netw3 Security
www.netw3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: Linux Kernel Exploits / ABFrag, (continued)
|