Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: Odd identd behavior
From: Disco Jonny <discojonny () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:10:33 +0000

Well, common sense would agree with you.  but in the UK it is all about intent.

case law would also seem to suggest that it is not the intent of the
attack that is involved, it would seem to be more the intent that the
vitim percives... (not knowing much about law i do not know how this
scans across to other sections of the law.)

An example is: -

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020375,39226548,00.htm

I dont know how this relates across international borders or in other countries.

i dunno though, just my 2p

Cheers

S.

On 11/16/05, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net> wrote:
On 2005-11-14 Levenglick, Jeff wrote:
I would not run nmap against someone else, you could find yourself in
legal trouble.

Very doubtful. I'm not aware of any law that forbids even portscans,
much less network troubleshooting or the use of tools like nmap in
general.

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Another option [for defragmentation] is to back up your important files,
erase the hard disk, then reinstall Mac OS X and your backed up files."
--http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25668



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]