Home page logo
/

interesting-people logo Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: FBI insists it can tap e-mail without a warrant
From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:15:49 -0700




Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 19:13:09 -0600
To: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
From: Brett Glass <brett () lariat org>
Subject: For IP: FBI insists it can tap e-mail without a warrant

Feds: No warrants for Net wiretaps
By Mike Brunker, MSNBC
May 17, 2000 7:20 AM PT

URL: 
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2570897,00.html?chkpt=zdhpnews01

In a case with broad implications for communications technology, lawyers 
for the Justice Department and a coalition of telecommunications and 
privacy groups square off in federal court Wednesday to argue whether the 
FBI should be allowed to intercept Internet communications and pinpoint 
the locations of cellular phone users without first obtaining a search warrant.

At issue in the proceedings before the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington 
are rules issued last year by the Federal Communication Commission 
spelling out how telecommunications providers will be required to comply 
with the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), passed 
by Congress in 1994.

Among other things, the act requires telecommunications equipment 
manufacturers and service providers to build into their systems the 
capability for surveillance of telephone line and cellular communications, 
as well as of services such as advanced paging, specialized mobile radio 
and satellite-based systems.

After telecommunications providers were unable to reach agreement with FBI 
officials on how to implement the monitoring capabilities, the FCC adopted 
rules that in several areas went beyond the CALEA language - including a 
requirement that cellular phones be traceable and that information on any 
digits dialed after a call is connected, which could include such things 
as account or credit-card numbers or call-forwarding instructions, must be 
provided.

Warrant not required

As interpreted by the FCC, the act also would require telecommunications 
providers to turn over "packet-mode communications" - such as those that 
carry Internet traffic - without the warrant required for a phone wiretap.

Taken in total, the FCC rules amount to a "significant expansion" of law 
enforcement's ability to monitor private communication, said Jim Dempsey, 
senior staff counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology.

"We're arguing that given the constitutional right to privacy, and given 
Congress' concern about protecting that privacy that it was wrong for the 
FCC to broadly interpret this statute to give more surveillance powers to 
law enforcement," he said.

...


"Rules? This is the Internet." -- Dan Gillmor



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • IP: FBI insists it can tap e-mail without a warrant Dave Farber (May 18)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]