mailing list archives
Re: Corporations are NOT persons.
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:36:27 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker () bbiw net>
Date: March 22, 2009 2:12:09 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Cc: ip <ip () v2 listbox com>, Dan Lynch <dan () lynch com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Corporations are NOT persons.
From: Dan Lynch <dan () lynch com>
Hear hear! Corporations are NOT persons. How that get encoded in our
Probably because corporations actually /are/ legal persons. Their
legal standing is not identical to humans, nevermind full citizens,
but persons nonetheless. There are even credible arguments that the
legal standing of corporations is in some ways stronger than of humans.
Wikipedia provides some convenient background on the topic:
But the gist is that if you list the legal rights of humans in the
U.S., you'll find that corporations share quite a few of the same ones.
The debate about similarities or differences between corporations and
human rights apparently goes back to the Romans, so it's not likely to
get settled anytime soon. Rather it looks like something worth
ongoing review, to make sure that an acceptable balance is
maintained. The assumption should be that things can and will go out
Imagine, for example, if Corporations were not permitted to make
political contributions. Would that, perhaps, violate their
"rights"? Would that, perhaps, alter the political process more
towards the folks who can vote than towards corporate dominance?
Questions that should at least be considered.
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com