Information Security News
mailing list archives
Court ruling critical to hacker charges
From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 02:55:46 -0500 (CDT)
By PETER GRIFFIN
A court decision that could prove critical to computer hacking cases
is expected today, when criminal proceedings that began almost three
years ago near their resolution.
Auckland man Andrew Garrett stands trial next month on 12 fraud
charges for the copying of passwords from customers of internet
service provider Telecom Xtra.
The Crown alleges that Garrett used a "Trojan horse" program, called
Back Orifice, to find passwords and other personal details that let
him use accounts belonging to Xtra customers.
At this week's pre-trial hearing in the Manukau District Court, Judge
David Harvey heard final arguments concerning the key issue of whether
the passwords Mr Garrett is alleged to have stolen could be classed as
documents under the Crimes Act 1961.
A ruling on the definition will be handed down by Judge Harvey in
another hearing scheduled for today, and is likely to take into
account the failed attempts of convicted "phreaker" Borislav Misic to
overturn his own conviction, which also rested on the legal definition
In April, Mr Misic lost his Appeal Court case, which sought to
overturn a two-year-old conviction for fraudulently using a computer
program to make more than 1400 hours of phone calls worth at least
Summing up in court yesterday, Judge Harvey compared the use of a
computer password to the keying in of a credit card number when buying
goods over the internet from websites like Amazon.com.
He said the credit card information originated from a document, and
therefore that information, when stored on a computer, would probably
constitute a document as well.
Meanwhile, Mr Garrett's defence counsel is continuing its appeal
against Judge Harvey's previous ruling, which found that existing
charges against the accused of wilful damage and threatening to damage
property could stack up according to the Crimes Act, and computer
demonstrations may be conducted during the trial for the benefit of a
The Crimes Amendment Bill No. 6, currently before the law and order
select committee, is expected to be passed in the next two months,
adding much-needed clarification to the Crimes Act where cases of
computer hacking are concerned.
Mr Garrett's lawyer, Michael Levett, said he had made a submission to
the Court of Appeal, and would carry through on that if Mr Garrett was
"If he is acquitted of the charges, there is no point in the Court of
Appeal getting involved and reviewing the matter," he said.
The man at the centre of the drawn-out case just wants the legal
proceedings to end so that he can get on with his life.
Mr Garrett said the fact he had been on bail for so long had made it
nearly impossible for him to secure employment, and the case had taken
a major toll on his family.
"This case has been part of our lives for nearly three years. Several
times I have come very close to shutting up and saying, 'Do what you
want with me,' but my wife has stood by me all the way and encouraged
me to fight it."
Mr Garrett's trial, which begins on July 2 and is expected to run for
two to three weeks, may include evidence being presented from an
Australia-based witness via a video link.
ISN is hosted by SecurityFocus.com
To unsubscribe email isn-unsubscribe () SecurityFocus com
- Court ruling critical to hacker charges InfoSec News (Jun 08)