|
Information Security News
mailing list archives
MS vs. open source: Security's the same
From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 01:02:32 -0600 (CST)
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2857736,00.html
By Wayne Rash
March 25, 2002
wrash () mindspring com
I already know that you're going to hate what I have to say. You'll no
doubt send me strongly worded e-mails. Fine. We have a tough bunch
here at ZDNet, and we can take it.
When you read about the security problems of some open source
applications and operating systems, some of you have nodded
approvingly, and muttered words that sound a lot like "I told you so."
Let's face it, all the smugness about the superiority of open source
code has been pretty hard to take.
Of course, the open source people claim that such charges simply
aren't true. They say open source products are better because more
people work on them and then distribute the patches--meaning that
security holes get fixed right away. Microsoft, as the leading vendor
of proprietary software, claims the same thing.
The fact is, both sides have their share of problems--but neither side
has the edge when it comes to fixing security holes. You're just as
likely to encounter a security problem with open source code as you
are with Microsoft Windows, and the fix is just as likely to appear
quickly and be done properly.
Normally, this is the point where Microsoft gets trashed for its
seemingly endless list of security patches for Windows. That's not
going to happen here. Yes, Microsoft does have a long list of security
issues for which it has issued patches. But the fact that those
patches exist means somebody in Microsoft is making sure those fixes
are made.
According to Steve Lipner, Microsoft's Director of Security Assurance,
the company's Security Response Team operates seven days a week and
has been known to issue patches to Windows security within hours of
finding out about a problem. This sounds pretty responsive to me,
certainly as responsive as the open-source solution to fixes--hoping
someone steps up to the plate, creates a fix, and makes it available.
The problems with security are not greater or fewer with Microsoft's
code versus open source. They're just different. Want another opinion?
In the FBI's ongoing list of the top 20 security problems, the number
of Windows and open-source problems are about equal. The bottom line
is that you should choose your OS or Web server software by how well
it meets your needs--because these days, security really isn't the
differentiating factor.
-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org
To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY
of the mail.
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- MS vs. open source: Security's the same InfoSec News (Mar 28)
|