|
Information Security News
mailing list archives
Security Excuses are on the Rocks
From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 01:29:07 -0600 (CST)
Forwarded from: Elyn Wollensky <elyn () consect com>
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s=706&a=24507,00.asp
By Peter Coffee
March 25, 2002
Welcome to "stupid customers," the saga of IT vendors' ongoing
attempts to blame the victim. This week, we honor Jim Balsillie,
chairman and CEO of Research In Motion, who commented earlier this
month on the intrinsic insecurity of Internet traffic—and why it's not
his company's fault that people don't understand it.
Balsillie was asked about an attack discovered by @Stake that enabled
researchers to read wireless messages intended for a user of the
Internet Edition of RIM's popular BlackBerry device. He huffed and he
puffed and he blew the question down, saying, "Internet traffic isn't
supposed to be secure. ... It's kind of like a company making beer and
cola and someone saying that there's alcohol in the company's drinks,
when the children are drinking cola."
Well, no, it's really not like that, and IT executives need to
understand why that's a deeply flawed analogy.
First comes the matter of labeling. Alcoholic beverages are labeled
and sold in a manner that leaves no doubt as to what you're getting,
with full disclosure of the harm that it can do: birth defects,
impairment of driving ability and long-term health problems.
Even my Nokia phone displays the warning "Voice privacy not active"
for the duration of my call unless link security is in effect. That's
far more forceful than RIM's approach of warning by omission, with RIM
executives saying that security was never promised or that the Mobitex
specification makes it all clear.
Second comes the matter of expectation. Beer ads don't show Boy Scouts
drinking the product - but we see the RIM advertisements in in-flight
magazines and elsewhere, and they don't show people relying on their
BlackBerry units for updates on their local coffee shop's waiting
times. The RIM ads all suggest that these devices will warn you of
crucial business developments, such as changes to a proposed contract
or other urgent matters. Don't such important purposes call for secure
message platforms?
Alcohol labels and advertising rules aren't voluntary. Would IT
vendors like to have legislators do the same for them?
Report your pink elephant sightings to peter_coffee () ziffdavis com
-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org
To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY
of the mail.
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Security Excuses are on the Rocks InfoSec News (Mar 28)
|