Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos

Information Security News: Windows Vista More Vulnerable To Malware Than Windows 2000

Windows Vista More Vulnerable To Malware Than Windows 2000

From: InfoSec News <alerts_at_infosecnews.org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 07:46:25 -0500 (CDT)

http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207601217

By Thomas Claburn
InformationWeek
May 8, 2008

Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT)'s Vista operating system is more susceptible to
malware than Windows 2000, and though it's 37% more secure than Windows
XP, it's still too vulnerable.

That's the contention of security vendor PC Tools Software, which has a
financial interest in the vulnerability of Microsoft's software.

"Ironically, the new operating system has been hailed by Microsoft as
the most secure version of Windows to date," said Simon Clausen, CEO of
PC Tools, in a statement. "However, recent research conducted with
statistics from over 1.4 million computers within the ThreatFire
community has shown that Windows Vista is more susceptible to malware
than the eight year old Windows 2000 operating system, and only 37% more
secure than Windows XP."

According to statistics gathered from users of PC Tools' ThreatFire
security service, Vista let 639 threats per thousand computers through,
compared with 586 for Windows 2000, 478 for Windows 2003, and 1,021 for
Windows XP.

ThreatFire is an anti-malware system that tries to block malicious
software based on its behavior rather than by signature matching.

Given an infection rate of 639 per 1,000 PCs, almost 64% of Vista users
should have compromised machines.

Michael Greene, VP of product strategy for PC Tools, said that the
malware identified had "gotten to the desktop and to the point of doing
something bad." He said that he didn't have the ThreatFire data
immediately accessible but said that presumably some of the monitored
machines also had third-party antivirus software that missed the
malware.

That tendency, the inability of signature-based antivirus systems to
keep up with auto-generated malware variants, is the reason PC Tools
developed ThreatFire, Greene explained.

A Microsoft spokesperson questioned whether PC Tools' methodology
conforms with Microsoft's methodology.

"We appreciate independent studies and encourage researchers to help us
make our products more secure; however, this is a study by a vendor of
anti-malware products," a Microsoft spokesperson said in an e-mailed
statement. "ThreatFire vulnerability comparison numbers certainly don't
reflect our vulnerability findings from the malicious software removal
tool (MSRT), which ran on over 400 million machines in December 2007.
>From June 2007 through December 2007, the MSRT found malware on 2.8% of
the Windows Vista machines it ran on, vs. 7.2% of Windows XP SP2
machines. It found malware on 5% of Windows 2000 SP4 machines and 12.2%
of Windows 2000 SP3 machines. Note that for Windows 2000 this spans both
client and server machines."

_______________________________________________
Attend Black Hat USA, August 2-7 in Las Vegas,
the world's premier technical event for ICT security experts.
Featuring 40 hands-on training courses and 80 Briefings
presentations with lots of new content and new tools.
Network with 4,000 delegates from 50 nations.
Visit product displays by 30 top sponsors in
a relaxed setting. http://www.blackhat.com
Received on May 09 2008

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]