Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Bugtraq: Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?

Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?

From: Paul Szabo <psz_at_maths.usyd.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:26:24 +1000 (EST)

3APA3A <3APA3A_at_SECURITY.NNOV.RU> wrote:

> III. Details
>
> Inetd has an option
> -R rate ... default is 256 ...
> ... if more than 256 connections received in one minute [inetd] will
> disable service for next 10 minutes ...
> ... IP address of attacker will never be logged.
>
> IV. Workaround
>
> -R 0 -s your_ad_can_be_here

I guess you are trying to say that xinetd is more configurable than inetd.
Yes, it is known that with inetd you need tcp_wrappers to log attack IPs.

Your cure is worse than the disease: rate limiting allows a DoS against the
service, no limit allows a DoS against the whole machine.

Cheers,

Paul Szabo - psz@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney 2006 Australia
Received on Sep 08 2003

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]