Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Bugtraq: Re[4]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?

Re[4]: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?

From: 3APA3A <3APA3A_at_security.nnov.ru>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:56:27 +0400

Hello Paul,

Monday, September 8, 2003, 11:11:12 PM, you wrote:

>>
>> -s limits number of processes invoked from same IP. You can additionally
>> use -c to prevent distributed attack. It doesn't allow to DoS box and
>> doesn't disable service for 10 minutes.

PS> Note that my (DEC/Compaq/HP Tru64) inetd does not have -c or -s options.
PS> The only safe way is to use a sensible -R and tcp_wrappers. Or upgrade to
PS> Linux and xinetd...

It proofs code needs to be rewritten. I don't understand why limitation
is on per minute, not per second base. Oh no - I understand. This is
result of the code was written more than 10 years ago. But what I
completely misunderstand is how disabling service for 10 minutes
increases security. It's because I'm green, stupid and brain damaged.

IMHO reasonable behavior is limiting a number of requests accepted per
second without disabling service. But this code became a kind of saint
cow. Only hope is young monsters like xinetd will rid this dinosaur off
as a result of evolution.

-- 
/3APA3A
Received on Sep 08 2003
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]