Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Bugtraq: Re: SHA-1 broken

Re: SHA-1 broken

From: Damian Menscher <menscher_at_uiuc.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:35:59 -0600 (CST)

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 securityfocus_at_microtechnical.co.uk wrote:
>
> In much the same way if the original text was 'I owe you 1 million
> dollars' and the collision text was 'sdf86*&6989h,mni lkj99j' its not
> significant.

Hey, Nick. I want to confirm that I've installed GPG correctly. Would
you mind signing some random text, say, "sdf86*&6989h,mni lkj99j", so I
can test it?

I'll admit I agree with your point, though. The demonstrated collisions
in MD5 (none have been demonstrated in SHA-1 yet) varied four high-order
bits. So it'd be fairly unrealistic (in the real world) to generate a
useful collision. Here I define "useful" to mean at least one side has
to be intelligible (as opposed to your definition of having both sides
be intelligible).

Damian Menscher

-- 
-=#| Physics Grad Student & SysAdmin @ U Illinois Urbana-Champaign |#=-
-=#| 488 LLP, 1110 W. Green St, Urbana, IL 61801 Ofc:(217)333-0038 |#=-
-=#| 4602 Beckman, VMIL/MS, Imaging Technology Group:(217)244-3074 |#=-
-=#| <menscher_at_uiuc.edu> www.uiuc.edu/~menscher/ Fax:(217)333-9819 |#=-
-=#| The above opinions are not necessarily those of my employers. |#=-
Received on Feb 21 2005
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]