Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Bugtraq: RE: [Full-disclosure] Anonymous Web Attacks via DedicatedMobileServices

RE: [Full-disclosure] Anonymous Web Attacks via DedicatedMobileServices

From: Alexander Klimov <alserkli_at_inbox.ru>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:04:58 +0300 (IDT)

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Bojan Zdrnja wrote:
> Regarding Google - yes, if you log only connections.
> However, when you use translate.google.com service, Google will add a new
> header in the HTTP request:
>
> X-Forwarded-For: <IP address>
>
> All proxy servers should add this header, even in the case of multiple
> proxying, in which case all IP addresses should be listed under this header.
>
> For Apache, there is even a mod_extract_forwarded module which should change
> the connection so it looks like it's coming from the IP behind the proxy
> server.
>

If you do assume that x-forwarded-for is always genuine then you will
have problems when somebody with direct connection adds
x-forwarded-for to confuse you (this is very similar to email
headers).

BTW: I don't sure that it is that important for real attackers -- most
of them are likely to use owned hosts anyway.

-- 
Regards,
ASK
Received on Jul 30 2005
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]