Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Firewall Wizards: Re: Biometrics (was Re: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN)

Re: Biometrics (was Re: Username password VS hardware token plus PIN)

From: Crispin Cowan <crispin_at_immunix.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:45:42 -0700

Marcus J. Ranum wrote:

>In the case where you have a human guard in the system,
>the human guard will generally (assuming it's not a
>$7/hr idiot) so dramatically out-perform a computer system
>that you may as well omit the computer system entirely.
>
>
I roll to disbelieve. This study shows 71% of people will give up their
password for a candy bar
http://www.enterpriseitplanet.com/security/news/article.php/3342871
Kevin Mitnick was most successful with exploits that involved social
engineering. I don't actually believe that "Private Bob" is
significantly resistant to a social engineering attack.

    * Scientist: Bob, this here is my girlfriend, and I don't want my
      wife to find out, so could you look the other way?
    * Bob: Why, sure ...

Like other multi-factor authentication systems, I suspect that
biometrics + human guard works much better than either in isolation.

Crispin

-- 
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.  http://immunix.com/~crispin/
CTO, Immunix          http://immunix.com
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Received on Apr 15 2005
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]