I am aware of how that works, my question was as to whether anybody had seen
attacks/code using a port other than 135? Sorry for any confusion.
_____
From: Brad Bemis [mailto:Brad.Bemis_at_airborne.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:51 PM
To: Paul Tinsley; full-disclosure_at_lists.netsys.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It is not necessarily port 80, but TCP port 593 (RPC-over-HTTP) or any IIS
HTTP/HTTPS port if COM Internet Services are enabled.
Thank you for your time and attention,
========================
Brad Bemis
========================
Email Notice: This communication may contain sensitive information. If you
are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this
communication in error; do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or
otherwise use the information contained herein for any purpose. Please
alert the sender that you have received this message in error, and delete
the copy that you received.
- -----Original Message-----
From: Paul Tinsley [mailto:pdt_at_jackhammer.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:38 PM
To: full-disclosure_at_lists.netsys.com
Subject: [Full-disclosure] DCOM Exploit MS03-026 attack vectors
Microsoft owns up to the exploit being usable on 135, 139 and 445, I have
heard rumors of port 80 being vulnerable as well. I was curious as to
whether anyone had seen anything using a port other than 135? Everything I
have seen discussed here and elsewhere has been 135 specific.
Thanks,
Paul Tinsley
Email: <pdt_at_jackhammer.org>
Web: http://www.jackhammer.org
Phone: +1 615 973-5353
Pager: +1 615 960-7766
Mail: 2228 Spartan Ct.
Murfreesboro, TN 37128-5395
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPynxwJDnOfS48mrdEQJaIwCg59OdO0iAY8DbnRGTfiSybBR37mEAn3iK
nKdaM9mEiU5RJJga0O/37HSA
=VOLZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on Aug 01 2003
Intro
