Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!

My vote goes to choice #1. :]

-- 
Greetz,
 8tImER                            mailto:8tImER_at_gmx.net
                                   GPG Key-ID: 0xADD46137
Originaltext:
Am 21.08.2003 um 19:43:02 hast du geschrieben:
> Hey folks,
> ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE AS TO HOW
> THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO CONTINUE OPERATING. 
> The subject header is going to change.
> This is a survey to see whether people want:
> 1. To have no subject prefix, that is, we remove [Full-Disclosure]
> or
> 2. To shorten the subject prefix from [Full-Disclosure] to [FD]
> or 
> 3. Do nothing
> 1. The first choice is preferable for me and, I would hope, for most folks.
> Len says he didn't really want it when he started the list anyways.  So we are
> actually going to change it now.
> 2. Choice two may be preferable for people who can only filter their incoming
> messages based on the subject prefix.  So, if you WANT there to continue
> to be a subject prefix, SPEAK UP!!!
> 3. Choice three sucks and if anyone wants this SPEAK UP so we know just
> how many people want this.  This is the least preferrable as it clutters
> the Subject header and makes the list harder to read through for those of us
> using a text based e-mail client.
> For those of you using procmail or a compatible filter, a good match
> for Full-Disclosure that relies on headers you will always see in
> list messages goes like this:
> :0:
> * ^Sender.*full-disclosure-admin_at_lists\.netsys\.com
> full-disclosure
> That matches this header:
> Sender: full-disclosure-admin_at_lists.netsys.com
> Alternately, you can tell your Pegasus/Mozilla/Outlook/OE/Whatever
> to match on this header.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html