madsaxon <madsaxon_at_direcway.com> wrote:
> At 04:37 PM 5/4/2004 +0200, Christian Fromme wrote:
>
> >Censorship is not what we're looking for.
>
> I think that's a debatable issue. It seems to me that
> some people on this list confuse "full disclosure of
> exploit-related code and advisories" with "unfettered
> posting of any shit that comes into a 14 year old's head
> at the moment." This list would be far more productive
> if we weren't constantly subjected to this barrage of
> pointless flaming and adolescent taunting. I trust at
> least one person will reply to this with something that
> illustrates my point.
I agree in parts, of course. And:
"unfettered posting of any shit that comes into a 14 year
old's head at the moment." - hell, that was a funny one.
Sad enough thats true also.
But still, I personally wouldn't buy
that for the cost of censorship. Just my opinion.
Cutting out the "bad bits" and what the "bad bits" are depends
in some cases too much on the opinion of the moderator.
Best wishes,
Christian
--
Christian Fromme
chris at linux.fanatism.us
PGP-Pubkey: http://www.informatik.fh-wiesbaden.de/~cfrom001/pgp/index.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on May 04 2004
Intro
