On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:37:28 EST, Matt.Carpenter_at_alticor.com said:
> todays hacker community. But the realities are that we are paranoid enough
> to watch access to said systems to avoid at least 99% of local hacking,
> eliminating that from feasibility.
We are?
At least some of the machines used had active wireless on them - and I'm
pretty sure that they were *not* on the lookout for somebody out in the
parking lot (or *inside* the next building over) with a laptop and
a Pringle's can.
And how, pray tell, do you get "paranoid enough to watch access" to mean
*anything* when we allow the hacker *physical* *access* *AND* be unsupervised
due to the design of the polling booth?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Nov 11 2004
Intro
