Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Full Disclosure: RE: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman emailharvester

RE: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman emailharvester

From: Aditya Deshmukh <aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.expertworks.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:31:53 +0530

>Hashcash isn't even a tiny speed bump if you're a spammer and
>have 50,000
>zombies - each one only takes a 5 second hiccup and continues
>spamming....

Hashcash and other systems that rely on some sort of check summing is going
to cause problems and hence their adoption is always going to be under a
cloud !

For me the best possible thing to do is to put up a openbsd server with
postfix / clam av / spam assassin / amavaris combo

1. postfix will reject 90% of the spam during the initial handshake stage -
by using a variety of dns / mx resolution tricks
2. clamav and spam assassin integrate into postfix so that you don't have to
accept the spam the server can even issue a 550 in the middle of the data
stage
3. using some known blacklists like spamhaus and rbl will cut down spam to
99.9 %

With a combo of all this : no spam - we do not have to worry about our
address being leaked.

________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on Feb 13 2005

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]