<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" alt="i" width="728" height="90"/></a>

Nmap Security Scanner

Docs
Security Lists

Full Disclosure

More
Security Tools

Packet crafters

More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:

edgeos

Full Disclosure: RE: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman emailharvester

RE: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman emailharvester

From: Aditya Deshmukh <aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.expertworks.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:49:33 +0530

> But cutting off 82% even
>before the DATA command is not too shabby. OTOH it is a sign on how bad
>mail has become if more than 80% are plain junk even without looking at
>the content.

Amd it is going to get worse from here!

________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on Feb 15 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Georgi Guninski: "linux kernel 2.6 fun. windoze is a joke"
Previous message: Randal, Phil: "RE: RE: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer no t seeing KB887742 and KB886185"
In reply to: Volker Tanger: "Re: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman emailharvester"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]