Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Penetration Testing: Re: [PEN-TEST] Your opinions are solicited ...

Re: [PEN-TEST] Your opinions are solicited ...

From: L.W. <eldub_at_POBOX.COM>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:51:59 -0800

-> > -----Original Message-----
-> > From: Paul Robinson [mailto:paul_at_AKITANET.CO.UK]
-> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 9:59 AM
-> >
-> > [...]
-> > In
-> > addition I'd probably do some session-authentication with
-> > changing cookies
-> > per transaction, combined with IP authentication.
-> > [...]
->
-> IP authentication? In today's world or access through NATed firewall
-> or proxy servers, or providers like AOL, all in an Internet
-> environment increasingly becoming akamaied... uhm... cached, I
-> strongly doubt that IP authentication is viable. Take AOL users for
-> example: One request appears to be coming from proxy1.aol.com, the
-> next request from proxy3.aol.com. That would mean that your 'IP
-> authenticated' web page will invalidate the second request.

Actually, many systems allow SSL sessions to bypass the proxy (many online
services, especially banks, require a direct connections for SSL). This
makes IP-based authentication possible under that context, although not
guaranteed.

-LW
eldub_at_pobox.com
Received on Nov 01 2000

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]